Зеленский поддержал военную операцию против Ирана

· · 来源:data资讯

// 对每个gap,进行gap组插入排序

Губернатор Тульской области Дмитрий Миляев добавил, что пострадавших нет, разрушений инфраструктуры также не зафиксировано.

Ginger VS,详情可参考WPS官方版本下载

Медведев вышел в финал турнира в Дубае17:59

Что думаешь? Оцени!

民营经济促进法草案将初审

Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.